<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secure Email Alternatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://privacyharbor.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/secure-email-alternatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://privacyharbor.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/secure-email-alternatives/</link>
	<description>Moving to secure communications.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://privacyharbor.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/secure-email-alternatives/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://privacyharbor.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-6</guid>
		<description>As you point out, usability has been the big inhibitor keeping people from using more secure email practices.  Security and ease of use seem to be inversely proportional.

Further discussion on secure email and a (incomplete) comparison of providers can be found at http://www.novo-ordo.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you point out, usability has been the big inhibitor keeping people from using more secure email practices.  Security and ease of use seem to be inversely proportional.</p>
<p>Further discussion on secure email and a (incomplete) comparison of providers can be found at <a href="http://www.novo-ordo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.novo-ordo.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
